Closing the gap: A two-site MLC matching study for Varian TrueBeam Linear Accelerators

RESUMO

Purpose: To characterise and harmonise multileaf collimator (MLC) gap calibrations across four beam-matched TrueBeams and assess a common planning-system model. Methods: Four Millennium 120 TrueBeams were studied: TS1 (installed 2016), TS5 (2021), TS6 and TS7 (2024). Gap calibration was assessed by RayStation sweeping-gap measurement, feeler gauge, the EPID-based Stakitt Fence test, and a leaf-resolved Machine Performance Check (MPC). TS1 and TS5 were adjusted in service mode, TS5 also for MLC centreline offset. Ten clinical VMAT plans, and six acquired earlier on an unadjusted reference machine, were measured with an ArcCHECK 1220 against doses computed at 0.053 and 0.065 cm x-offsets in RayStation. Results: The 2024 machines had wider baseline gaps. All four methods registered the TS1 and TS5 changes in the same direction and within 0.060 mm of predictions. After adjustment TS1 and TS5 lay within the TS6/TS7 sweeping-gap and Stakitt ranges but read wider on the feeler gauge. A conventional picket-fence test on TS5 registered no change. Raising the RayStation x-offset parameter increased mean local 3%/2 mm pass rates from 92.3% to 94.8% on TS1 and 93.2% to 95.6% on TS5; all 24 plan-criterion pairs improved on the unadjusted machine. Conclusions: Mechanical, EPID, and sweeping gap MLC gap measurements responded consistently to the MLC adjustment, moving TS1 and TS5 towards the local reference range. Every global 3%/2 mm ArcCHECK measurement exceeded the TG-218 95% limit.