Compositional Shift Algebra: Extrapolating Mixed Robot Shifts Without Mixed Finetuning

RESUMO

Robot deployments rarely change one mechanism at a time: cameras, action interfaces, and physical dynamics often shift together. Prior adaptation recipes either finetune a new model for every mix or attempt to select which module to update. We instead learn shift operators on a modular stack z{=}E(o), a{=}g(z,u), z'{=}f(z,a) and compose them. Compositional Shift Algebra (CSA) fits single-factor observation, policy, and dynamics operators from exact-reset probes, then extrapolates held-out mixed shifts by operator composition---without mixed-shift finetuning. On ManiSkill StackCube, residual CSA matches an oracle mixed inverse on held-out mixes (success 1.0 over 10 seeds) while beating best-single / zero-shot / parameter-average baselines by { approx}67 pp. RGB-D vision-in-the-loop composition remains near oracle and far above non-compositional arms; a delay commutator stress shows ordered necessity for policy timesdelay. On a second task (PickCube), residual CSA again reaches compose 1.0 vs. 0.33 non-compositional (n{=}10), and an L1 vision controller without privileged cube/goal poses or grasp flags in the control loop retains compose 0.95 vs. 0.00. Main-track upgrades freeze PushCube (+33 pp), PegInsertion joint8 / pose7 EE (+67 pp each), and thin BC under frozen CSA (+67 pp); deeper BC and fair adapt baselines still need compose (+67 pp each), vision-localized BC needs compose (+56 pp), and delay favors ordered/few-shot deploy. We report Intervention-Gated Adaptation as a negative control.