PAPER / ARXIV:2609.07358
Paul Althaus , Leon Houf , Christiane Schwieren
RESUMO
Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.
NO MESMO MAPA
Resumo indisponível. Consulte o paper original.
Resumo indisponível. Consulte o paper original.
Resumo indisponível. Consulte o paper original.